Category: RRR

  • Why Professional Presence Comes Before Communication

    Most experienced professionals don’t suffer from a lack of expertise.

    They suffer from a gap.

    A gap between how good their work actually is

    and how clearly others recognise it.

    This gap shows up in familiar ways:

    • People misunderstand what you do
    • You get introduced with the wrong labels
    • You’re brought into conversations too late
    • You’re valued for execution, not judgment
    • You have to “explain” far more than feels reasonable

    The reflex response is almost always the same:

    “I need to clarify my message.”

    More words.

    More explanations.

    More slides.

    More content.

    And yet, very often, clarity doesn’t solve the problem.

    It reinforces it.

    When seeking clarity makes things worse

    Here is the uncomfortable observation this work starts from:

    If you have to explain repeatedly, the issue is rarely communication.

    It’s presence.

    Not presence as in visibility.

    Not presence as in confidence or performance.

    And not presence as in personal branding.

    Professional Presence is something more structural.

    It’s the set of mental shortcuts other people use when they encounter your work:

    • what problem they associate you with
    • when they think of you
    • how they describe you when you’re not in the room

    Those shortcuts are formed before people pay attention to your words.

    Which means that communication is already operating inside a box —

    often the wrong one.

    When that box is misaligned, better explanations don’t help.

    They make the mismatch sharper.

    Presence is upstream of communication

    This is the central premise behind the work we do at FutureIsMade:

    Professional Presence comes before communication.

    Communication is visible.

    Presence is prior.

    Presence determines:

    • what people listen for
    • what they filter out
    • what they remember
    • where they place you in their mental map

    If presence is fuzzy, communication becomes effortful.

    If presence is misaligned, communication becomes counterproductive.

    This is why smart, articulate professionals are frequently less understood than they expect.

    Their expertise pushes them toward explaining —

    but explanation is a downstream fix for an upstream problem.

    A different starting point

    Instead of asking:

    “How do I explain this better?”

    we start with different questions:

    • What concern do people already associate me with?
    • In which situations do they think of me—and in which ones they don’t?
    • What wrong but plausible box do they put me in?
    • What do people get right about my work—and what do they consistently miss?

    These questions don’t produce copy.

    They produce diagnosis.

    They reveal whether the issue is:

    • being relatable enough to be recognised
    • being rememberable in the right way
    • or being remembered for the wrong thing altogether

    This is where most professional positioning work skips ahead too fast.

    It jumps to messaging without stabilising presence.

    Why this work exists

    This article — and the book it originates from — exists for a simple reason:

    There is a growing population of experienced professionals who are:

    • competent
    • thoughtful
    • credible
    • often even successful

    …and yet subtly mispositioned in how they are perceived.

    Not invisible.

    Not unknown.

    Just slightly off in how recognition forms around them.

    Professional Presence is not a tactic to fix that.

    It’s a discipline.

    A way of thinking—and acting—that sits underneath communication, marketing, and business development.

    Once presence is aligned, communication becomes lighter.

    Shorter.

    More economical.

    And often, less necessary.


    Note

    This article is adapted from the opening pages of an upcoming foundational book on Professional Presence. The book is not a manifesto and not a how-to manual. It exists as a reference point — a way to name, stabilise, and work with a problem many experienced professionals feel but struggle to articulate.


  • What Four Restaurants Taught Me About the Three Rs


    I didn’t set out to test a framework. I just went out to eat.

    Over the years, in different cities and countries, here are four gourmet restaurant experiences.
    All were technically “good.” As you would expect from such a place.

    Of these four, one stayed with me. Undeniably!.

    Looking back, they form a surprisingly clear illustration of what happens when you have two Rs—and what changes when you have all three.


    Restaurant #1 — Lyon, France

    Relevant. Rememberable. Not relatable.

    On my birthday, my wife offered me, as a present, a fine-dining experience in Lyon.

    The setting was spectacular. From our table you could see the whole city and, in the distance, even Mont Blanc.
    The food, however, was not what I expected from a gourmet restaurant. It lacked the zing you expect at that level. For me, it felt boring.

    In RRR terms:

    • Relevant—I love fine dining.
    • Rememberable—mainly because of the view.
    • Not relatable—the food didn’t connect.

    I remember the place.
    I don’t miss the experience.


    Restaurant #2 — Barcelona, Spain

    Relevant. Relatable. Not rememberable.

    One of my first fine-dining experiences was in Barcelona.
    All I remember clearly is that the amuse-bouche was excellent.
    The rest of the meal? Completely forgettable.

    • Relevant—again, fine dining.
    • Relatable—the food and context made sense.
    • Not rememberable—I don’t even remember where it was.

    It worked.

    And then it vanished.


    Restaurant #3 — Cologne, Germany

    Relevant. Relatable. Weak presence.

    In Cologne, I went to a gourmet restaurant where the food was good.

    So yes:

    • Relevant — I enjoy fine dining.
    • Relatable — the food delivered.

    But the experience itself was flat.
    The waiters couldn’t guide wine choices, food pairing, or the experience as a whole. It felt like a basic restaurant wearing a gourmet label.

    It was not rememberable.

    Interestingly enough, the restaurant lost its star a few months later.


    Restaurant #4 — Porto, Portugal

    Relevant. Relatable. Rememberable—for the right reasons.

    Porto was different.

    The experience started by entering through the kitchen, where you met the chef in person.
    The food was Portuguese, shaped by the influence of a French chef, with a written story accompanying each of the 15 courses.
    Every detail was thought through.
    At one point, because the light was not sufficient for my poor eyesight, they brought reading glasses and a small reading light—without me even asking.

    That’s when you know an experience will stay with you.

    I will probably go back every time I return to Porto.


    Conclusion — why two Rs are not enough

    These four restaurants made something very clear:

    Relevant and Relatable do most of the work.
    They open the door. They make people stay.

    But they don’t decide what lasts.

    That’s the role of Rememberability.

    And here’s the nuance that matters:

    You are always remembered—just not always for the reasons you would want.

    A great view can make you remember a place you won’t return to.
    Correct execution can fade into nothing.
    Good intentions without presence disappear.

    Relatable and Relevant feed Rememberable.

    They create the conditions.

    Rememberability is decided in the experience itself—in the care, in the friction removed, in the moments that quietly say:

    “This was designed with me in mind.”

    The goal is not to be remembered. The goal is to be remembered for the right reasons.

    That applies just as much to professional presence as it does to fine dining.


  • Relatability: The Foundation That Turns Experience Into Influence

    The Quiet Shift

    There’s a moment that arrives quietly in the middle of a career.

    Not a crisis. Not a setback.

    Just a shift you can feel, even if you can’t quite name it yet.

    You’re more capable than ever.
    You speak with clarity shaped by real experience.
    You’ve lived enough to know what matters—and what doesn’t.

    And yet… people don’t always feel you the way you expect them to.

    They respect your work.
    They recognise your competence.
    But something in the connection feels thinner than it used to be.

    A small gap appears. One that shapes everything that follows. A gap between the experience you carry and what others actually receive.

    I remember a moment from years ago when this gap became unexpectedly clear to me.

    Someone said something I rejected immediately:

    “Liviu, do you want to be right, or do you want to be successful?”

    At the time, it sounded harsh.
    Almost cynical.
    As if being successful meant giving up on truth or integrity.

    It took me years to understand the many layers behind that question.

    Sometimes we insist on being right in ways that make us unreachable.

    Not out of arrogance—out of habit.
    Out of experience.
    Out of protection.

    And when that happens, relatability quietly disappears.

    Not our competence.
    Not our values.

    But the human bridge that allows others to connect with them.

    The Gap We Don’t Talk About

    As we move forward in our professional lives, something paradoxical often happens.

    We speak from a higher altitude.
    We simplify less — or explain too much.
    We protect ourselves emotionally, often without noticing.
    We lead with competence before humanity.
    We carry authority that others experience as distance.

    None of this is wrong.
    It’s what experience builds in us.

    And yet, over time, our expertise grows stronger while our relatability weakens.
    When that happens, influence—understood as the ability to convey vavalue—begins to fade at the edges.

    Quietly. Gradually. Almost invisibly.

    Relatability as the Missing Bridge

    Relatability is the missing bridge.

    Not charm.
    Not performance.

    But reachability.

    Relatability is what makes your depth accessible.
    What turns experience into something others can actually use — and trust.

    What Relatability Actually Is

    Relatability is many times misunderstood.

    • It’s not oversharing.
    • It’s not emotional display.
    • It’s not lowering standards.

    Relatability is quieter than that.

    • It is emotional proximity without overload.
    • Clarity without abstraction.
    • Humanity without performance.
    • Professionalism without distance.

    It’s the difference between being understood and being received.

    Why It Matters More in Midlife

    Early in a career, competence is often enough.
    Later, something shifts.
    People don’t choose you only because you can do the work.

    They choose you because they can relate to the person behind the work.

    Expertise without relatability becomes heavy.
    Relatability without expertise becomes empty.

    Presence needs both.

    What Happens If Nothing Changes

    Nothing dramatic happens.

    Nothing collapses. But something meaningful is lost.

    • Ideas travel shorter distances.
    • Presence creates less pull.
    • People admire your results but don’t quite grasp your intention.
    • Opportunities drift toward those who feel closer, warmer, more accessible.

    It’s not failure. It’s unrealised influence.

    What Changes When Your Professional Presence Becomes Relatable Again

    When people can feel you again, things soften—and strengthen—at the same time.

    • Conversations deepen.
    • Influence rises.
    • Stories create recognition instead of distance.
    • Guidance lands more fully.
    • Expertise becomes easier to adopt.

    Relatability doesn’t replace competence. It amplifies it.

    Reflection Tool: The Relatability Check-In

    1. When was the last time someone felt your intention, not just your argument?

    2. Where does your presence feel thinner than it should?

    3. What small part of your story could build a bridge if shared lightly?

    4. Where has expertise quietly fused with emotional distance?

    5. Who needs to feel you more than they need to be impressed by you?

    6. What influence becomes possible if you allow yourself to be more reachable?

    Closing

    You’ve lived enough to have something meaningful to offer.
    Relatability is what allows others to truly receive it.|
    And when your presence becomes relatable again, everything you know begins to carry the influence it deserves.